Feeds:
Færslur
Athugasemdir

Posts Tagged ‘Underwater recording’

IMG_2200

I have made a trip to Skorradalsvatn lake several times to record under the ice in recent winters. It has had mixed results and often without success mainly because of poor weather conditions.
It is best to record when it is windy and not too much frost so  I can work on the ice without problems. The hole for the hydrophones must not freeze within four hours and I must not get too cold while waiting for the „harvest“. Too much snow on the ice is not on the wishlist, but anyway hydrophone cables buried under snow can  avoid wind noise from cables, if the wind is too strong on the surface.
On February 15th I arrived northeast of the lake at a place where I myself can get shelter between high trees even though it is windy out on the frozen lake. At this place I also get rid of the electrical pollution that I have detected further west in this 20 km long lake.
When I arrived at the lake on this fine day, the wind was unfortunately decreasing. I didn’t even notice any „singing“ or „humming“ sound from the lake’s icy surface, even though the wind was blowing. So I wasn’t expecting a powerful musical composition under the ice.
This year the ice was about 35-45 cm thick, combined with Ice slush and nowhere seemed to be like a solid glass. So I realized that the sounds under the ice would be different this year.
I got into some strange trouble on the ice. I first planned to record on a Tascam FR-AV2. But everything was drowned out by white noise, so I switched to a MixPre. There I struggled with a poor power supply connection. I got it working and started recording. Two hours later I arrived at the recording place and noticed the recorder was dead. I started recording again and recorded for another hour.
It turned out when I got home that I had managed to record for an hour in the first recording.
But that was not all. The second recording was at a much lower gain level with more noise, even though I hadn’t changed the settings.
Now a month later the power connection to the MixPre is repaired which will hopefully never cause trouble again. In a recording trip week later I noticed that the 25V Li-Ion battery pack I use for the Hydrophones will drop voltage sharply in frosty conditions which explains lower gain level on the second recording.
But what happens with the Tascam this day, is a mystery
The audio file below is from the first recording. The sound is quite different from those heard when the ice is solid and transparent. The sounds are still interesting and constantly changing due to different winds on the surface.. Some of the sounds surprised me a bit. You can hear car traffic in the recording. But about 200 meters from the recording place is a road by the lake. When cars drive by, heavy rumblings like an earthquake can be heard in the recording, Also a noise when these cars drive over a barred gate.
Quality open headphones are recommended while listening at any comfortable level, but be carefull, there are high dynamic moments.
If the media player doesn’t start to play, please reload this individual blog in a new tab or frame.

(mp3 256kbps / 57,5Mb)

Recorder: Sound devices MixPre6
Mics: Benthowave BII-7121 Hydrophones (AB 5m & 6m deep)
Pic: Samsung S22

Weather: Clear sky, 1-4m/sec, -8 to -12°C
Location: 64.513020, -21.412597

Read Full Post »

IMG_2200
It really doesn’t matter where you turn on the microphone or other sensors, there seems to be life everywhere.
There was no exception to this in the nature reserve in Flói, southwest Iceland 17th July 2022. All night I had been recording the bird life in the same place as I have done every year for over a decade. I had gathered all the equipment about noon and was ready to go, when I decided to prepare a coffee before heading to the next recording location.
So it was the perfect time to dip the Hydrophones in the next pond while waiting for the coffee.
The pond was full of life, although it could not be seen or heard on the surface. The soundscape was so interesting it turned out I was recording there for almost three hours.
After a short investigation I saw Agabus and Spined Stickleback. I am sure there were also moth larvae of different species, even some kinds of shrimp, where the sea is not far away. Some of these sounds may also be methane gas being released from the bottom of the pond.
The soundscape in the pond was similar to birdlife. The chorus from the biosphere in the pond came in waves. Sometimes the sounds were few and quiet, but then there came a time when the whole biosphere in the pond needed to be heard.
Below you can hear one such period.
The recording was recorded in 24bit/48Khz, but a lot of these sounds seem to be able to go well above 24Khz. It tells me that the next time I record in this pond, I should do it at a higher resolution, 96Khz or even higher.
It is always quite difficult to record with hydrophones. The sensitivity is such that, once they are in water, the cables must not touch anything that might move, not even the wind. Although the Hydrophones were well immersed in the pond, you can hear many things in the recording, e.g. in planes, car traffic, footsteps and a Black Headed Gull that probably made a sound as it flew over the pond.
This recording didn’t require a lot of editing. However, 20Hz was taken down by -20dB. I thought it was necessary since these Hydrophones have flat frequency range down to 0.4Hz and the MixPre6 down to 10Hz. Most of the rumble that was heard in the original recording was therefore vibrations from cars and air traffic and possibly also from the waves along the south coast. The recording got a very gentle noise reduction and normalized about +7dB, up to -8dB peak level.
Quality open headphones are recommended while listening at low to mid volume.
If the media player doesn’t start to play, please reload this individual blog in a new tab or frame.

  (mp3 256Kbps / 49,6Mb)

Recorder: Sound devices MixPre6
Hydrophones:. Benthowave BII-7121
Pix: Canon EOS-R

Location: 63.900400, -21.192364
Weather: Gust 1-4m, partly cloudy

Read Full Post »